Wednesday, November 18, 2015

Reflection on Project 3

In this blog post I will be reflecting on my Project 3 essay.

Piolle, Guillaume. "Loch Alsh - Reflection" 8/7/2009. Creative Commons.
1. What was specifically revised from one draft to the next?

I mainly revised the grammatical errors that were in my draft. I also revised the draft so that they essay would flow better. I also tried to change the organization.

2. Point to global changes: how did you reconsider your thesis or organization? 

I tried to reorganize my whole essay so that it flows better with what I am trying to say. I tried to start with medical school and go through all the problems you could have up to becoming a doctor.

3. What led you to these changes? A reconsideration of audience? A shift in purpose? 

I think that flow of the essay was the reason that I changed. The purpose or audience didn't really shift but I wanted the essay to flow better.

4. How do these changes affect your credibility as an author? 

This effects my credibility because it makes my whole essay more sound and that makes my arguments appear stronger which adds to my credibility.

5. How will these changes better address the audience or the venue? 

I always kept the audience in mind when writing this and when I did my revisions, I did it so that it would appeal more to the audience and sound like a better argument. 

6. Point to local changes: how did you reconsider sentence structure and style?

I reconsidered the sentence structure and style so that the essay would have more flow. Once I created more flow the essay arguments sounded stronger.

7. How will these changes assist your audience in understanding your purpose?

These will help the audience because it makes my argument stronger.

8. Did you have to reconsider the conventions of the particular genre in which you are writing? 

I didn't have to rethink the conventions because when I wrote the draft I made sure that I kept the conventions in mind at all time.

9. Finally, how does the process of reflection help you reconsider your identity as a writer? 

I think this reflection process helps me realize where I am as a writer because it helps me realize what exactly I am doing during my whole writing process.

Publishing Public Argument

In this blog post I will be publishing my Public Argument. A link can be found HERE.

llyushka88. "Done" 12/4/2009. Creative Commons.




1. Mark with an "x" where you feel your target audience currently stands on the issue (before reading/watcing/hearing your argument) below:
←----------------------X------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------->
Strongly                                            Totally neutral                                                    Strongly 
agree                                                                                                                          disagree


2. Now mark with an "x" where you feel your target audience should be (after they've read/watched/heard your argument) below:
←----------------------------------------------------|----------------X----------------------------------------->
Strongly                                            Totally neutral                                                    Strongly
agree                                                                                                                          disagree


3. Check one (and only one) of the argument types below for your public argument:
         _______ My public argument etablishes an original pro position on an issue of debate.
         _______ My public argument establishes an original con position on an issue of debate.
         _______ My public argument clarifies the causes for a problem that is being debated.
         ___X___ My public argument prooposes a solution for a problem that is being debated.
         _______ My public argument positively evaluate a specific solution or policy under debate (and clearly identifies the idea I'm supporting).
         _______ My public argument openly refutes a specific solution or policy under debate (and clearly identifies the idea I'm refuting).


4. Briefly explain how your public argument doesn’t simply restate information from other sources, but provides original context and insight into the situation:

My public argument doesn't simply restate information because I decided to use the proposal argument. At the end I propose a solution to the problem at hand which is my own personal material and opinion. This is how I added original context and insight to the situation.


5. Identify the specific rhetorical appeals you believe you've employedi n your public argument below:
Ethical or credibility-establishing appeals
                    __X__ Telling personal stories that establish a credible point-of-view
                    __X__ Referring to credible sources (established journalism, credentialed experts, etc.)
                    __X__ Employing carefully chosen key words or phrases that demonstrate you are credible (proper terminology, strong but clear vocabulary, etc.)
                    __X__ Adopting a tone that is inviting and trustworthy rather than distancing or alienating
                    _____ Arranging visual elements properly (not employing watermarked images, cropping images carefully, avoiding sloppy presentation)
                    _____ Establishing your own public image in an inviting way (using an appropriate images of yourself, if you appear on camera dressing in a warm or friendly or professional manner, appearing against a background that’s welcoming or credibility-establishing)
                    _____ Sharing any personal expertise you may possess about the subject (your identity as a student in your discipline affords you some authority here)
                    __X__ Openly acknowledging counterarguments and refuting them intelligently
                    __X__ Appealing openly to the values and beliefs shared by the audience (remember that the website/platform/YouTube channel your argument is designed for helps determine the kind of audience who will encounter your piece)
                    _____ Other: 

Emotional appeals
                    __X__ Telling personal stories that create an appropriate emotional impact for the debate
                    _____ Telling emotionally compelling narratives drawn from history and/or the current culture 
                    __X__ Employing the repetition of key words or phrases that create an appropriate emotional impact 
                    _____ Employing an appropriate level of formality for the subject matter (through appearance, formatting, style of language, etc.)
                    _____ Appropriate use of humor for subject matter, platform/website, audience
                    __X__ Use of “shocking” statistics in order to underline a specific point
                    _____ Use of imagery to create an appropriate emotional impact for the debate
                    _____ Employing an attractive color palette that sets an appropriate emotional tone (no clashing or ‘ugly’ colors, no overuse of too many variant colors, etc.)
                    _____ Use of music to create an appropriate emotional impact for the debate
                    _____ Use of sound effects to create an appropriate emotional impact for the debate
                    ____ Employing an engaging and appropriate tone of voice for the debate
                    _____ Other: 

Logical or rational appeals
                    _____ Using historical records from credible sources in order to establish precedents, trends, or patterns
                    __X__ Using statistics from credible sources in order to establish precedents, trends, or patterns
                    _____Using interviews from stakeholders that help affirm your stance or position
                    __X__ Using expert opinions that help affirm your stance or position
                    __X__ Effective organization of elements, images, text, etc. 
                    _____ Clear transitions between different sections of the argument (by using title cards, interstitial music, voiceover, etc.)
                    __X__ Crafted sequencing of images/text/content in order to make linear arguments
                    __X__ Intentional emphasis on specific images/text/content in order to strengthen argument
                    _____ Careful design of size/color relationships between objects to effectively direct the viewer’s attention/gaze (for visual arguments)
                    _____ Other: 


6. Below, provide us with working hyperlinks to THREE good examples of the genre you've chosen to write in. These examples can come from Blog Post 11.3 or they can be new examples. But they should all come from the same specific website/platform and should demonstrate the conventions for your piece:

Sunday, November 15, 2015

Reflection on Project 3 Draft

In this post I will be reflecting on my project 3 draft. I peer reviewed Dylan's draft and Mehruba's draft.

EditorE. "Yellow Review logo". 9/1/2013. Creative Commons.


Saturday, November 7, 2015

Draft of Public Argument

In this blog post I will explain to my classmates what they might need to know before they look at my draft.

Reneman. "DRAFT ICON" 2/24/13. Creative Commons.

You can find my draft HERE.

I want to know if I meet the conventions of some of the other articles that I hyperlinked in my "Analyzing My Genre" blog post. I also want to know if I present my argument well and if I added to the argument and did not restate things already said.

Considering Visual Elements

In this blog post I will be talking about the visual elements of my paper.

Comestai. "Yoga Space - United Visual Artists - Volume Installation" 12/17/2010. Creative Commons.


Are the fonts appropriate for the visual rhetoric of my paper?

The fonts seem to be appropriate. They tend to be smaller font and times new roman to seem very professional and less elementary. 

Is font large enough to be read at the distance it will be viewed from?

The font is large enough to be seen from the desired distance. It is intended to be seen from a computer screen so the size seems to be appropriate.

Does image emphasize my argument in an important way?

The images that I will use will be used to appeal to the emotions of the readers. This will be important to my argument.


Does graph support my major point?

Yes they support my major argument that not everyone is right for medical school.

Is image in close proximity to my major point it is emphasizing?

Yes. It will be used right next to the point that I am emphasizing so that It is relevant to the my argument.

Is visual rhetorical tone of the project consistent?

The visual rhetorical tone is consistent throughout the project. The font size and use of images is very consistent.

Project 3 Outline

Analyzing My Genre

In this blog post I will be analyzing a genre that I will be publishing my project in.


Proulx, Phillepe. "Pomme et genre d'abeille". 4/23/2007. Creative Commons.
Example 1
Example 2
Example 3
Example 4
Example 5

Social Context

  • Where is the Genre set?
Mainly articles on http://www.studentdoctor.net
  • Subject of Genre
This site mainly concerns everything to do with helping students become doctors.
  • Who uses Genre?
Anyone who thinks that they can help students become doctors
  • When and Why is genre used? What purpose does the genre serve for the people who use it?
This genre is used to help any student get into med school.


Rhetorical Patterns of the Genre



  • What type of context is usually included and excluded
There is not a lot of context given because they assume that everyone who is reading in this genre is fairly knowledgable of the medical discipline.
  • What rhetorical appeals are usually used?
The medical field is highly reliant on logical thinking. The appeal to logos is used a lot in this genre because people in the medical field like to deal with factual evidence.
  • How are the texts organized? Any similarities?
The texts on this sight usually consist of short paragraphs. There is not a lot pictures because it seems like appeal to emotion is not popular in the genre.
  • Do sentences in this genre have the same style?
The sentences seem to have the same style. Most of the sentences vary in size which is what a good author does.
  • What type of word choice is used?
You could probably consider the word choice as serious and very scientific.

Analyze what Patterns reveal about Genre



  • Who does genre include and exclude?
This genre includes students that want to find out more information about the medical field. It also includes MD's who offer expert opinion about various things.
  • What roles for writers and readers does genre encourage?
This website offers forums where anyone can post on certain subjects and have people reply to them.
  • What values and beliefs are assumed about or encouraged from users of this genre?
This genre is for anyone who wants to go into the medical profession and it can be used to help the do so.
  • What content does the genre treat as most valuable?
I don't think that there is one thing that this genre treats as most valuable however they are mainly concerned with helping students become doctors.