At the end of this
project I will be asked to write my very own QRG. To familiarize myself on the
subject I looked at several different QRG’s so that I could get an idea of what
they are like and so that I can imitate the same format and strategies and
implement them into my own guide. I will be answering some questions about what
I have noticed about QRG’s.
Vourloumis, Eirini . "A Father and Daughter at a Demonstration in Athens in Late June". June 2015 |
What do the conventions of this
genre - the Quick Reference Guide - seem to be?
QRG’s
seem to be written in a way that can be easily read. They seem to follow the
same guidelines as blogging in that it is written in a way that is easy to
read. Most of the QRG’s have subtitles that help the reader easily navigate
through the article.
How are those conventions
defined by the author’s formatting and design choices?
Many of
the authors of QRG’s implement an array of different devices to support what
they are saying in the article in the easiest way possible. Some of these
include hyperlinks that link directly to the website of research, subtitles for
easy navigation, Pictures to keep the reader interested as well as to appeal to
certain emotions, etc. there are many different devices that are used in QRG’s,
this is just a short list of examples.
What does the purpose of these
QRGs seem to be?
The
purpose of a QRG is to present information in a way that can be easily accessed
and absorbed into the minds of anyone. Most of the time QRG’s present information
on controversies in an easily understandable way.
Who is the intended audience for
these different QRGs? Are they all intended for similar audiences? Or
different? How & why?
I think that QRG
would target a person that doesn’t want to know every little thing about
anything, but rather wants to know the basic idea about a particular subject. They
can find out a good deal of information quickly by referring to a QRG.
How do the QRGs use imagery or
visuals? Why do you think they use them in this way?
I think
that the authors of QRG’s use imagery in a way that will appeal to the emotions
of the reader. Emotions and facts are two completely different things and the
author cannot always activate your emotions using words alone. An example of
this would be the picture of the little girl in the QRG on the Greek debt
crisis.
Reflection:
I looked at Mehruba's blog post and I agree with everything that she said. The main point that she was trying to get across was how QRG are naturally informative. Alyssa had similar answers to mine. I agree with her in that the QRG should be presented in a storytelling type way that is still informative. Dylan made a good point about the purpose of a QRG. I agree with him that the purpose of a QRG is to get you familiarized with a certain subject and then direct you to further reading if you desire.
I agree with you that the conventions of a QRG are made with the reader in mind. Every aspect- like the pictures, headlines, and short paragraphs- adds to the experience for the reader. I agree with you also that imagery/visuals are used to appeal to emotions but I also believe that they can be used to convey data.
ReplyDeleteAll your conventions and explanations listed about QRGs are the same as what I gathered! I like how your post is informative but straight to the point. You explained what a QRG is very well.
ReplyDeleteI agree with your analysis of QRGs. However, as much as I agree that they provide general information to readers, I think it is also important to keep in mind that specific information is also covered, too.
ReplyDeleteI agree with what you think are the conventions of a QRG. I agree with you in that the information should be able to be absorbed in the minds of everyone. I think that is a very important part of a QRG!
ReplyDelete